36 Years After Baren: The Uprising That Exposed China’s War on Uyghurs

4
Baren-Revolution-1990

As the 36th anniversary of the Baren Uprising approaches, Uyghur groups and human rights advocates are once again drawing attention to what they describe as one of the earliest large-scale crackdowns in China’s ongoing campaign against Uyghur Muslims in East Turkistan.


The uprising began on April 4, 1990, in Baren Township near Kashgar. It was not an isolated incident, but a response to mounting repression forced abortions, religious restrictions, and political control imposed by the Chinese Communist Party. What followed was swift and brutal. Chinese armed police and People’s Liberation Army units moved in, crushing the uprising with overwhelming force.


Beijing has never allowed a transparent accounting of what happened. Official figures downplayed casualties, but Uyghur groups and independent observers have long maintained that the real toll was far higher. What is clear is that the crackdown did not end with Baren it marked the beginning of a new phase of systematic repression.


In the weeks that followed, thousands of Uyghurs were arrested, labeled “separatists,” and detained. The language used then “counter-revolutionary,” “extremist,” “threat to stability” has remained unchanged, forming the foundation of policies that continue to this day.
“The massacre in Baren is a solemn reminder of the consequences of inaction,” said Rushan Abbas of Campaign for Uyghurs.


Three decades later, that warning has materialized. Since 2017, over a million Uyghurs and other Turkic Muslims have been detained in what China calls “re-education” centers facilities widely described by survivors and international observers as internment camps. Reports have documented forced labor, coercive sterilization, family separation, and the systematic destruction of religious and cultural life.


What began in Baren has expanded into a full-scale system of control.China continues to justify its actions under the banner of “counterterrorism” and “stability.” But critics argue that these labels mask a broader campaign to erase Uyghur identity and suppress any form of dissent. The same logic used in 1990 to justify a crackdown is now used to defend mass detention and surveillance.


For many Uyghurs, April 5 marks the moment when repression became policy when resistance was met not with dialogue, but with force. It stands as a reminder that the current crisis did not emerge suddenly, but was built over decades.As commemorations take place worldwide, activists are calling for accountability, recognition, and action warning that without sustained international pressure, the cycle that began in Baren will continue unchecked.
Thirty-six years on, the question remains the same: how long can repression be ignored before it becomes normalized?

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here