China’s Sinister Playbook: After Renaming Tibet, Is Inner Mongolia Next?
In its latest move to erase minority cultures and assert dominance over its frontier regions, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) appears to be rebranding...
28th Anniversary of The Ghulja Massacre: China’s Bloody Crackdown on Uyghur Freedom.
The city of Ghulja, East Turkestan (officially called Yining, Xinjiang by China), became a battleground on February 5, 1997. Thousands of peaceful Uyghur demonstrators took to the streets to demand justice, freedom, and an end to religious and cultural repression. The response? Brutal violence from Chinese security forces, mass arrests, and the cold-blooded killing of innocent people. Today, on its 28th anniversary, we remember the lives lost and the crimes the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has tried to erase from history.
On that bitter winter morning, thousands of Uyghurs gathered in the streets of Ghulja, chanting for freedom and equal rights. The Chinese authorities had long been suffocating Uyghur culture—banning traditional meshrep gatherings and arresting religious leaders under fabricated charges of "separatism."
Remembering Tiananmen Square: A Nation’s Wound That Never Healed
Thirty-five years ago, on June 4, 1989, Beijing’s Tiananmen Square became the site of a state-sanctioned massacre. What began as a peaceful student-led movement calling for democracy, transparency, and basic freedoms ended in bloodshed under the treads of Chinese tanks and the gunfire of the People’s Liberation Army.
Detailed Analytical Article on Qing Report: Chapter 1 – Introduction
The report posits that the CCP's claim is not just a historical interpretation, but a strategic political narrative designed to legitimize the current Chinese administration's control over Tibet. The insistence on Tibet being an "inseparable part" of China is rooted in the CCP's need to maintain territorial integrity and political stability, rather than in any factual historical continuity.
Tibet’s Autonomy and Resistance During the Qing Dynasty: A Comprehensive Historical Analysis
The historical analysis of Tibet during the Qing Dynasty reveals a region that consistently resisted external control and maintained significant autonomy in governance, law, economy, and culture. Despite the Qing court’s efforts to centralize control and assimilate Tibetan society, the resilience of Tibetan institutions—particularly monasteries and local governance structures—ensured that Tibet operated largely as an independent entity.
China’s Policy of Cultural Genocide in Tibet
Since the Chinese occupation of Tibet in 1959, the CCP has continuously engaged in a consistent effort over 60 years to replace Tibetan culture...
Debunking China’s distorted historical claims over Tibet
The events of 2023 have recently intensified the debate over China’s claims over Tibet and its legality. It’s of no surprise that the Peoples...
Debunking Historical Myths: Tibet’s Status During the Ming Dynasty
The historical relationship between Tibet and China during the Ming Dynasty is often misconstrued, with many sources claiming Tibet was part of China. However,...
Tibet’s Gen Z the new saddle for China’s Hoax ‘Development’
On May 23, 2023, Beijing observed a forum on the development of Tibet where the primary topic of discussion was ‘Younger generation contributing to...
Anti-Dalai Lama Narratives Exposing Puran Chettri For the 2nd Time : The Propagandist Trying...
Puran Chettri is back at it again, doubling down on his conspiracy-laden claims about the Dalai Lama. His latest blog post reads like a greatest-hits compilation of Chinese propaganda—chock full of baseless allegations, obscure sources, and a narrative that sounds suspiciously familiar to anyone who’s read the CCP’s playbook. Let’s unpack Chettri’s latest diatribe and see just how far he’s strayed from reality.